Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567180›Full record

ArticleDEN open2026

Comparison of Detection Yields Between Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Mode 1 and Mode 2 for Colorectal Lesions: A Post-hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Observational Study.

Kensuke Shinmura, Hiroaki Ikematsu, Taku Sakamoto, Maasa Sasabe, Tatsuro Murano, Yasuhiko Mizuguchi, Hiroyuki Takamaru, Toshiki Futakuchi, Naoto Tamai, Kazuki Sumiyama and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kensuke ShinmuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8786-4634
Hiroaki IkematsuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Taku SakamotoEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-4977
Maasa SasabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Tatsuro MuranoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Yasuhiko MizuguchiEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Hiroyuki TakamaruEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Toshiki FutakuchiDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Naoto TamaiDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9183-7353
Kazuki SumiyamaDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7976-6070
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9574-7451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Colonoscopy is a reliable technique for the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of adenomas and early cancer. Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) is important for detecting colorectal lesions. Texture and color-enhancement imaging (TXI) has recently emerged as a novel modality for IEE. Thus, TXI operates in two modes: mode 1 (TXI1) enhances the structure, color, and brightness, whereas mode 2 (TXI2) does not. We have previously reported the detection of colorectal adenomas using TXI. We aimed to determine the detection yields of TXI1 and TXI2 using the data from our previous study. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the colonoscopy data from three institutions between August 2020 and January 2021. The patients were classified into two groups: TXI1 and TXI2. The mean number of adenomas detected per procedure (MAP), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and flat adenoma detection rate (FDR) were compared between groups. Results: The evaluations (95% confidence intervals) for the TXI1 versus TXI2 groups were as follows: MAP, 1.5 (1.3-1.7) versus 1.5 (1.3-1.7); ADR, 56.8% (47.3-65.9) versus 59.7% (50.3-68.6); and FDR, 68.6% (59.5-76.9) versus 63.9% (54.6-72.5), with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: The detection rates of colorectal lesions were comparable between the TXI1 and TXI2 groups.

Indexed as

colorectal neoplasiadetectiontexture and color enhancement imaging mode 1texture and color enhancement imaging mode 2white light imaging

Identifiers

PMID41567180
PMCPMC12817192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.