Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567173›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology

Incidence of urinary infections and urosepsis after ureteroscopy for stone disease: a systematic review of literature.

Arianna Pischetola, Thomas Hughes, Robert Geraghty, Mohammed Boulmani, Bhaskar K Somani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arianna PischetolaUniversity Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Faculty of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Thomas HughesDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Robert GeraghtyDepartment of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Mohammed BoulmaniBoston Scientific, Urology and Pelvic Health, Paris, France.
Bhaskar K SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ureteroscopy (URS) and laser lithotripsy are commonly used to treat kidney and ureteric stones. Post-operative infections, including urinary sepsis, can be a potentially serious complication of URS. We aimed to systematically review the incidence and predictors of post-ureteroscopy infections and sepsis. Design: Systematic review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD420251102349). Data sources and methods: Only studies in the English language with over 500 patients were included. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) framework for this study examined inpatients with stone disease who underwent ureteroscopy to investigate the incidence of urinary infections and urosepsis. Results: Nineteen studies published between 2015 and 2024 were included, totalling 939,860 patients undergoing ureteroscopy for urolithiasis. Patient demographics varied, with a mean age range of 41.3-59.1 years and a male predominance (63.9%). Laser lithotripsy was the primary modality used, with a mean operative time of 53.4 min.The overall incidence of post-operative infectious complications was 7.8%, ranging from 0.8% to 18.2%. Fever (0.0%-16.2%) and urinary tract infections were the most commonly reported (0.0-12.3%), followed by sepsis (0.0%-7.0%) and septic shock (up to 1.9%). Identified risk factors included female gender, positive pre-operative urine cultures, pre-operative double-J stent placement, patient comorbidities and prolonged operative times. Conclusion: Infectious complications predominate among post-ureteroscopy complications. Key factors for post-ureteroscopy infections included female gender, patient comorbidities, positive pre-operative cultures and longer operative times, highlighting the need for targeted management strategies to reduce complications.

Indexed as

postoperative complicationsrisk factors ureteroscopysepsisurinary tract infectionsurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41567173
PMCPMC12816510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.