ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
A Bayesian Multilevel Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Survival Outcomes in Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Studies.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Bayesian Multilevel Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Survival Outcomes in Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Studies.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cluster randomized controlled trials (CRCTs) are commonly used when interventions are delivered at the group level. Since data from CTCTs are inherently multilevel, methods that properly account for clustering are required. Joint modeling (JM) of longitudinal and survival data allows for simultaneous evaluation of intervention effects on repeated measures and time-to-event outcomes, offering a comprehensive view of intervention effects. However, existing JMs do not accommodate clustered data structures typically of CRCTs. This study introduces a multilevel joint model (MJM) to simultaneously evaluate intervention effects on correlated longitudinal and survival outcomes. The model was applied to empirical data from a large CRCT evaluating the PAX Good Behavior Game, a classroom-based mental health intervention involving 4189 Grade 1 students across 313 classrooms during the 2011-2012 school year. Mental health was assessed at three time points: pre-PAX (January 2012), post-PAX (June 2012), and Grade 5 (June 2016). Time-to-first mental disorder diagnosis was tracked through March 2024. Simulation studies further evaluated the MJM's performance under varying conditions, including censoring rates, cluster sizes, group-level variances, and survival model specifications. Results indicated the PAX program significantly improved mental health trajectories and reduced the risk of mental disorder diagnoses. The MJM outperformed traditional JMs by producing more accurate estimates and standard errors. Both empirical and simulation findings demonstrated that ignoring hierarchical structures leads to biased inferences and underestimation of intervention effects. The proposed MJM offers a robust and flexible analytic framework for analyzing data from CRCTs, emphasizing the importance of accounting for clustering in evaluating group-based interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.