Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567102›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Multiple Testing of Mix-and-Match Feature Sets in Multi-Omics.

Mitra Ebrahimpoor, Renée Menezes, Ningning Xu, Jelle J Goeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Making Statistics Clinically Meaningful.Clinical epidemiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mitra EbrahimpoorDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2299-876X
Renée MenezesBiostatistics Centre, Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ningning XuDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-0670
Jelle J GoemanDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 639.072.412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated analysis of multi-omics datasets holds great promise for uncovering complex biological processes. However, the large dimensionality of omics data poses significant interpretability and multiple testing challenges. Simultaneous enrichment analysis (SEA) was introduced to address these issues in single-omics analysis, providing an in-built multiple testing correction and enabling simultaneous feature set testing. In this article, we introduce OCEAN, an extension of SEA to multi-omics data. OCEAN is a flexible approach to analyze potentially all possible two-way feature sets from any pair of genomics datasets. We also propose two new error rates which are in line with the two-way structure of the data and facilitate interpretation of the results. The power and utility of OCEAN are demonstrated by analyzing copy number and gene expression data for breast and colon cancer.

Indexed as

GenomicsMultiomicsBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansclosed testingfeature set testingmulti‐omicsmultiple testing

Identifiers

PMID41567102
PMCPMC12825407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.