ReviewCancer science2026
Clinical Applications of Phosphoproteomics: Illuminating Cancer Signaling and Enabling Rational Therapeutic Strategies.
Review in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein phosphorylation is a central post-translational modification regulating cellular signaling, frequently dysregulated in cancer. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics has emerged as a powerful approach to systematically profile phosphorylation events, thereby revealing aberrant kinase activity and therapeutic vulnerabilities that are not captured by genomic or transcriptomic analyses. Recent advances across the workflow-including optimized sample preparation and phosphopeptide enrichment, isotope- or label-free quantitative strategies, high-resolution mass spectrometry platforms, specialized algorithms for site identification and quantification, and integrative informatics analyses-have enabled the detection of tens of thousands of phosphorylation sites even from small clinical specimens. These developments have facilitated the characterization of signaling pathways across diverse cancer types, leading to the identification of targetable kinases and informing therapeutic strategies. In this review, we highlight studies that employed phosphoproteomic analyses of clinical specimens or patient-derived cancer cells to delineate signaling characteristics and to propose and validate therapeutic targets. Collectively, MS-based phosphoproteomics is poised to become a cornerstone of precision oncology. By enabling comprehensive and quantitative mapping of phosphorylation events, this technology allows mechanistic dissection of cancer signaling pathways and uncovers therapeutic vulnerabilities that may be exploited with targeted agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.