ArticleUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea)2026
A computationally efficient pulse compression method of Barker-coded excitation using a mismatched filter in medical ultrasound imaging.
Article in Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBarker-coded excitation, which is well suited for portable ultrasound imaging because it preserves frame rate and uses binary encoding, exhibits a high range sidelobe level of 1/N after pulse compression. This limitation can be mitigated by employing a mismatched filter, albeit at the cost of increased computational complexity. This study proposes a pulse compression technique that applies a mismatched filter for Barker-coded excitation with reduced computational complexity.
methodsIn the proposed method, pulse compression is performed using complex baseband in-phase and quadrature (IQ) data after decimation rather than beamformed radio-frequency (RF) data. By decimating both the IQ data and the coefficients of the compression filter, hardware complexity can be reduced by a factor of L² (where L is the decimation factor) through the use of time-shared multipliers. The proposed approach was implemented in a custom-built portable ultrasound imaging system, and its performance was evaluated through simulations as well as phantom and in vivo experiments.
resultsFrom the simulation and phantom experiments, the proposed method achieved an identical -6 dB axial resolution compared to the conventional approach, i.e., pulse compression using RF data. The range sidelobes were comparable between the conventional and proposed methods, and consistent results were also obtained in the in vivo experiment.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate that the proposed method substantially reduces computational complexity while maintaining pulse compression performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.