Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2026
A cluster randomized trial of Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease platform among outpatients with advanced HIV disease in Uganda.
Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite significant progress in HIV care globally, a persistent 30-40% of people present with advanced HIV disease with ≤200 CD4 cells/µl. The Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease platform is a point-of-care CD4 test being implemented in resource-limited settings. We sought to assess clinical outcomes of survival and retention-in-care among people with advanced HIV disease based on CD4 testing modality.
methodsWe performed a cluster randomized clinical trial to evaluate the Visitect CD4 compared with onsite standard laboratory-based CD4 testing. The trial was conducted at 16 outpatient HIV clinics in Uganda. Those identified with CD4≤200 cells/µl received a standardized package of care for advanced HIV disease. The primary outcome was 24-week survival with retention-in-care. A costing analysis was performed. Randomization by CD4 methodology was stopped on 18 June, 2024, as the Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease platform was being implemented widely in Uganda, and randomization to non-Visitect CD4 platforms was unethical if no alternative CD4 strategies were available in a timely manner. We conducted a micro-costing analysis to estimate the resources used for each trial participant over the 6-month study period.
resultsBetween 5 May 2022 and 18 February 2025, 1724 participants were enrolled; 927 participants received Visitect CD4 testing (eight clusters), and 797 received standard CD4 testing (eight clusters). The composite endpoint of death or lost to follow-up occurred in 7.0% (63/901) who received Visitect CD4 testing and 7.2% (57/788) who received standard CD4 testing (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.69, 1.40). The estimated risk difference between arms was 0.01% (95% CI, -2.5, 2.5). Median time to antiretroviral therapy initiation was 0 days with Visitect testing versus 7 days with standard CD4 testing (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05, 1.45). Mean cost of 6-month care was US$115 for Visitect CD4 testing versus US$131 for standard-of-care CD4 testing.
conclusionsImplementation of Visitect CD4 testing demonstrated more rapid initiation of HIV therapy with equivalent 24-week survival and retention-in-care compared with other point-of-care CD4 strategies at equivalent cost. Despite its poor specificity, the Visitect CD4 platform remains a cost-neutral option compared to standard CD4 modalities. ARTICLE SUMMARY LINE: In this cluster randomized trial, we identified that participants with advanced HIV disease who were randomized to receive the Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease platform had equivalent 24-week survival with retention-in-care compared with standard CD4 testing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.