ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Machine Learning-Enhanced Analysis of Exosomal Surface Sialic Acid Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis and Therapeutic Monitoring.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, the absence of ovarian cancer (OC)-specific biomarkers impedes the development of precise noninvasive diagnostic and monitoring strategies. Exosomal surface sialic acid (SA), a key mediator of intercellular communication and disease progression, emerges as a promising biomarker, though its role in OC remains unclear. Conventional exosome isolation and detection methods exhibit limited clinical utility. Herein, we developed a CD63 aptamer-functionalized gold array chip integrated with a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanosensor for sensitive SA analysis. The chip efficiently isolated exosomes from clinical serum, while the nanosensor selectively bound exosomal SA via molecular recognition, thereby altering the SERS intensity ratio of the nanosensor. More importantly, machine learning can discern SA signatures from SERS spectra, achieving 93% accuracy in OC diagnosis. The longitudinal monitoring of SA throughout the entire treatment period (preoperative, postoperative, and chemotherapy) revealed a potential correlation with treatment response as indicated by clinical markers (CA125, HE4), demonstrating the utility of exosomal SA in precision treatment evaluation. This provides a powerful tool for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of OC and plays a critical role in precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.