ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026
Thigh gaps and filtered snaps: a qualitative study exploring opportunities to mitigate social media harm through content moderation for people with eating disorders.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ubiquity of social media has increased exposure to idealised beauty standards, often unrealistic and harmful. Repeated exposure has been linked to body dissatisfaction, harmful behaviours, and potentially the development of eating disorders (ED). Given the volume of content produced daily, effective harm mitigation strategies (automated or user-driven) are essential, requiring an informed understanding of the contexts and nuances surrounding harmful content.
objectiveThe study has two key aims: (1) to understand the perspectives of experts by profession and people with lived experience of ED, on what makes social media content harmful in the context of body image and ED, including why and how this harm occurs; and (2) to explore how technology might help mitigate these effects.
methodsWe engaged n = 30 participants, including 12 interviews with experts by profession (n = 2 ED support service providers and n = 10 body image and ED experts), and five focus groups with experts by lived experience (n = 18 people with lived experience of ED).
resultsUsing the Framework Method guided by inductive thematic analysis, we developed six prominent themes: (1) Spectrum of harmful and ambiguous content on social media, (2) The "echo chamber" of harmful content amplified by social media algorithms, (3) Balancing safety, freedom and responsibility in social media moderation, (4) Shared responsibility and collaboration for safer social media environments, (5) The role of representation and diversity in social media recovery and support, and (6) Harnessing digital innovation to reduce harm on social media. We developed an eight-category framework of harmful social media content, offering an underlying contextual understanding of harmful content and guidance for harm-reducing technologies.
conclusionsManual safeguards place significant responsibility on users. This work supports informed distinctions between harmful, ambiguous and safe content and provides design insights for classification systems and adaptable automated moderation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.