SynthesisAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2026
Proportion and antibiogram of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- The global epidemiology of MRSA.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance Profile, and Multidrug Resistance of Methicillin-ResistantHealth science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major public health concern, particularly in resource-limited settings such as Africa. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the proportion of MRSA among S. aureus isolates from patients with confirmed infections and to assess associated antibiotic resistance profiles across the continent.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in African Journals Online, African Index Medicus, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for studies published between January 1, 2013, and June 5, 2024. Primary studies were included if they reported MRSA proportion or resistance profiles in Africa, employed reliable detection techniques, and analyzed clinical specimens from infected patients. Statistical analyses were performed using the meta package in R software, applying a random-effects model. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThis meta-analysis included 191 studies, encompassing 40,979 S. aureus isolates. Nigeria contributed the highest number of studies (n = 29), followed by Egypt (n = 26). The vast majority of studies (n = 186) were based on hospital settings. The pooled proportion of MRSA in Africa was 42.2% (95% CI 38.7-45.6). By detection method, proportion was 41.4% for mecA, 42.8% for the cefoxitin disc method, and 39.1% for the oxacillin disc method, with no significant differences observed (p = 0.8). Regionally, Northern Africa had a significantly higher proportion of 56.2% (95% CI 49.3-62.9) compared with 36.7% (95% CI 33.2-40.4) in Sub-Saharan Africa (p < 0.001). At the country level, Eritrea reported the highest proportion (71.8%), followed by Egypt (61.8%), while the lowest rates were observed in Malawi (7.0%) and Gabon (8.2%). Regarding MRSA resistance profiles, linezolid (3.4%) and vancomycin (4.7%) showed the lowest resistance rates, whereas higher rates were noted for fusidic acid (11.6%), rifampin (28.4%), clindamycin (40.4%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (54.5%), and tetracycline (60.2%). Limited data were available for telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, tedizolid, ceftaroline, mupirocin, and daptomycin.
conclusionThe proportion of MRSA in Africa remains high at 42.2%, with marked regional disparities. Although resistance rates for linezolid and vancomycin are relatively low, they surpass global averages, raising concerns about emerging resistance. Alarmingly high resistance rates to several other antibiotics further underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions and continuous surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.