Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41566542›Full record

SynthesisAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2026

Proportion and antibiogram of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ahmed Azzam, Heba Khaled, Ahmed Salem, Muhamad Sayed, Abdelmarouf Mohieldein, Mohamed S Elsayed, Enas Mohamed Lotfy, Hend H A M Abdullah, Fatma E Hassan, Hassan Marei and 10 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  2. The global epidemiology of MRSA.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ahmed AzzamDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Capital University (formerly Helwan University), Cairo, Egypt.
Heba KhaledDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed SalemTanta Health Insurance Hospital, Gharbia, Egypt.
Muhamad SayedMinya Chest Hospital, Minya, Egypt.
Abdelmarouf MohieldeinDepartment of Medical Laboratories, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed S ElsayedPharmacology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Merit University, Sohag, Egypt.
Enas Mohamed LotfyDepartment of Public Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia.
Hend H A M AbdullahDepartment of Parasitology and Animal Diseases, Veterinary Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Fatma E HassanDepartment of Physiology, General Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, 21442, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan MareiCairo University Student Hospital, Giza, Egypt.
Nouran HassanDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Pathology, Faculty of Pharmacy, October University for Modern Sciences & Arts, Cairo, Egypt.
Elham AbdulnabyDepartment of Central Labs, National Nutrition Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Gellan Alaa Mohamed KamelDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Uruk University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ismael OsmanInternal Medicine Resident, Shubra Health Insurance Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed Ahmed RedaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Dina IsmailAl Karkh General Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.
Mahmoud NazihAl Ryada University for Science and Technology, Sadat City, Menoufia, 16504, Egypt.
Haitham SalemFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Amar BasilBashir Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Dina RadyDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Dina.radi@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major public health concern, particularly in resource-limited settings such as Africa. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the proportion of MRSA among S. aureus isolates from patients with confirmed infections and to assess associated antibiotic resistance profiles across the continent.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in African Journals Online, African Index Medicus, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for studies published between January 1, 2013, and June 5, 2024. Primary studies were included if they reported MRSA proportion or resistance profiles in Africa, employed reliable detection techniques, and analyzed clinical specimens from infected patients. Statistical analyses were performed using the meta package in R software, applying a random-effects model. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThis meta-analysis included 191 studies, encompassing 40,979 S. aureus isolates. Nigeria contributed the highest number of studies (n = 29), followed by Egypt (n = 26). The vast majority of studies (n = 186) were based on hospital settings. The pooled proportion of MRSA in Africa was 42.2% (95% CI 38.7-45.6). By detection method, proportion was 41.4% for mecA, 42.8% for the cefoxitin disc method, and 39.1% for the oxacillin disc method, with no significant differences observed (p = 0.8). Regionally, Northern Africa had a significantly higher proportion of 56.2% (95% CI 49.3-62.9) compared with 36.7% (95% CI 33.2-40.4) in Sub-Saharan Africa (p < 0.001). At the country level, Eritrea reported the highest proportion (71.8%), followed by Egypt (61.8%), while the lowest rates were observed in Malawi (7.0%) and Gabon (8.2%). Regarding MRSA resistance profiles, linezolid (3.4%) and vancomycin (4.7%) showed the lowest resistance rates, whereas higher rates were noted for fusidic acid (11.6%), rifampin (28.4%), clindamycin (40.4%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (54.5%), and tetracycline (60.2%). Limited data were available for telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, tedizolid, ceftaroline, mupirocin, and daptomycin.

conclusionThe proportion of MRSA in Africa remains high at 42.2%, with marked regional disparities. Although resistance rates for linezolid and vancomycin are relatively low, they surpass global averages, raising concerns about emerging resistance. Alarmingly high resistance rates to several other antibiotics further underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions and continuous surveillance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsAfricaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAfricaAntimicrobial resistanceEpidemiologyMecANosocomial infectionsStaphylococcus aureusSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41566542
PMCPMC12849242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.