ArticleBMC research notes2026
Indigenous knowledge of traditional bonesetters and bone setting practice in Southwest Ethiopia: towards integration with modern health care system.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe indigenous knowledge of bonesetters and the practice of bone setting has contributed a lot to the modern medicine, and yet serving as primary source of care in low- and middle-income countries but got little attention. This study explored the indigenous knowledge of traditional bonesetters and bone-setting practice in Southwest Ethiopia.
methodsA mixed study design approach was done in southwest of Ethiopia, from August 15 to December 15, 2022. A total of 80 traditional bonesetter who predominantly manage injury and disorder to the bone and the musculoskeletal, and also health professionals were interviewed regarding their traditional knowledge and range of practice.
resultThe mean age of the study participant was 69 ± 6 and majority (99%) of them were male. Traditional bonesetters participated in this study primarily acquired their knowledge through family transmission (45%), spiritual belief or divine gift (30%), and observation or experience (25%). Qualitative interviews revealed three themes: transgenerational learning, spiritual grant often linked to twin births, and experiential practice. Most TBSs had over 20 years of experience treating fractures, dislocations, and sprains, mainly at home or via mobile visits. Diagnostic methods included history-taking, palpation, and inspection. Treatment relied on massage, splinting, and natural materials like leaves, butter, and animal skin. All TBSs emphasized that healing power resides in their hands, often viewed as a divine gift.
conclusionTraditional bonesetters in Southwest Ethiopia possess rich indigenous knowledge rooted in family heritage, spiritual beliefs, and experiential learning. Their practices reflect deep cultural traditions and community trust, often passed down through generations or revealed through personal experience. Despite limited formal training, they demonstrate diagnostic skill and therapeutic effectiveness using locally available materials. Massage and splinting remain central to their treatment approach. Recognition and documentation of these practices are essential to preserve Ethiopia's healing heritage. Future collaboration with formal healthcare could enhance integration and mutual learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.