ReviewJournal of intensive care2026
Discontinuation of the development of remimazolam for ICU sedation in Japan: background and rationale.
Review in Journal of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Remimazolam for ICU sedation: a genuine advance or a familiar story?Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Remimazolam besylate in the intensive care unit: emerging evidence, unresolved questions, and a potential clinical niche.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of Remimazolam on Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Surgical Patients: A Critical Review of Pharmacological Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine rapidly metabolized by carboxylesterase-1, was developed as a promising alternative for ICU sedation. It was anticipated to overcome the unpredictable accumulation associated with midazolam and the hemodynamic/metabolic risks of propofol, offering superior hemodynamic stability and potential benefits in reducing postoperative delirium. Its ultra-short, predictable half-life positioned it as an ideal candidate for facile titration in critically ill patients. However, the trajectory of remimazolam's development for long-term ICU sedation faced a critical setback in Japan. Based on results from the ONO-2745-04 Phase II trial conducted on mechanically ventilated postoperative patients, the development program for the ICU indication was halted in 2013. The central safety concern was the unexpected pharmacokinetic failure observed in a subset of patients receiving continuous infusion for 24 h or longer. Specifically, this subgroup exhibited plasma concentrations of the parent drug far exceeding predicted levels, resulting in significantly delayed awakening and recover. This observation directly challenged the fundamental non-accumulating advantage of the drug. The mechanism is hypothesized to be compromised carboxylesterase-1 activity due to severe critical illness, systemic inflammation, or organ dysfunction-conditions that impair the very non-organ-dependent clearance pathway the drug relies upon. While international experience continues to validate the safe and effective use of remimazolam for short-to-medium-term ICU sedation, the Japanese experience serves as a critical clinical warning. It underscores that even drugs with inherently favorable pharmacokinetic profiles are susceptible to unpredictable parent drug accumulation in the highly heterogeneous and physiologically compromised ICU population during prolonged infusion. Therefore, extreme caution and individualized dosing strategies are warranted for remimazolam use in critically ill patients, especially those with severe systemic dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.