ArticleMovement ecology2026
Windy weather drives social structure in wild zebra finches.
Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial connections provide individuals with multiple benefits. Individuals, however, are often constrained in how they socially organize due to ecological and environmental factors that affect individual space-use and movement patterns. Weather is one such factor that influences individual movements, and thus social structure. While on longer time scales (i.e., seasonally) the impacts of weather are relatively predictable, on shorter time scales (i.e., sub-daily), the impacts of weather on social organization are less predictable yet are largely overlooked.
methodsIn this study, we examined the influence of short-term weather components, specifically wind and temperature, on the social structure of free-living zebra finches (Taeniopygia castanotis) in the Australian arid zone. Our goal was to characterize if social network structure was impacted by hourly changes in these important weather components. To do so, we used an automated radio telemetry system to concurrently track 128 wild zebra finches for 12 consecutive days in the Australian spring in order to examine the relationships between weather components and social structure. Using Bayesian network analyses to account for the uncertainty in association strengths among individuals, we examined network structure, as measured by density and modularity, in relation to hourly wind speed, temperature, and time of day. Additionally, to assess if weather impacted the synchronization of group-level movements, we calculated proximity ratios between neighbouring individuals, which we related to wind and temperature.
resultsWe observed that network modularity increased during hours with higher mean wind speed and was highest in the morning and evening hours. In contrast, network density was not related to wind speed. Additionally, neither modularity nor density showed a significant relationship with temperature during the tracking period, however, this period did not cover a large temperature gradient. Group-level movement patterns as measured by proximity ratios between neighbouring individuals showed no relationship with either wind or temperature.
conclusionsOur results suggest that changes in wind impact social structure in zebra finches. Given the critical role that network modularity plays in social information transfer, increased wind could have important downstream consequences. Stochastic and more frequent changes in weather due to climate change could thus potentially disproportionately impact species, such as the nomadic zebra finch, that rely on locating ephemeral resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.