ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Improved detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in lymph node aspirates through GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay in Bangladesh.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBL) being the most prevalent type of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, there are limitations in laboratory diagnosis of TBL due to high cost, inadequate diagnostic efficacy and feasibility. Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay is a design-locked, molecular diagnostic technique that detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) genome and rifampicin resistance by targeting rpoB gene and mutations within the gene. Currently, there is limited evidence validating Xpert assay usage for diagnosing TBL in Bangladesh. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated diagnostic efficacy of Xpert, considering composite reference standard (CRS), i.e. combination of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy, culture, Xpert assay and cytology, as gold standard, and compared it to cytology.
methodsAFB microscopy, culture, cytology, and Xpert assay were conducted on fine needle aspirates collected from 523 presumptive TBL patients. Genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial colonies of culture-positive specimens. In order to confirm presence of MTB, PCR and gel electrophoresis were performed on extracted DNA to detect RD9 region of MTB DNA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Cohen’s kappa coefficient were determined, and McNemar’s test was performed for Xpert and cytology with respect to CRS. Additionally, latent class analysis was performed to estimate sensitivity and specificity of all four diagnostic modalities.
resultsXpert showed sensitivity and specificity of 72.9% (261/358) and 100% (165/165) respectively against CRS, with 69.8% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity using Bayesian latent class modeling. In contrast, cytology demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 84.1% (301/358) and 100% (165/165) against CRS, and 81.9% and 99.9% upon latent class analysis, respectively. Furthermore, Xpert showed moderate agreement with cytology (κ = 0.45, p < 0.0001), fair agreement with culture (κ = 0.30, p < 0.0001), and poor agreement with AFB microscopy (κ = 0.09, p < 0.0001).
conclusionOur study findings validate routinely using Xpert assay in TBL diagnosis and enable detecting patients with low bacterial load. However, further assessment via cytology is recommended for confirmation in Xpert-negative patients having patent symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.