ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2026
Application of optimal contribution selection, trait distribution management, and group selection in layer chickens.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptimal Contribution Selection (OCS) aims at maximizing long term response to selection by balancing short term genetic gain and inbreeding rate. In this study, OCS, trait management, and group mating methods were applied to poultry data to evaluate their potential impact. Real data from a White Leghorn line with 7 generations of pedigree and estimated breeding values (EBV) for 18 traits were used to evaluate responses from a single round of selection. It was shown that the current inbreeding rate is low and cannot be substantially reduced without significant loss of genetic gain, unless implemented in parallel with genomics to enable flexibility in population structure.
resultsAllowing flexible mating ratios under OCS resulted in 5.3 to 23.8% more genetic gain plus lower loss of genetic diversity compared to fixed-ratio ocs. However, in the case of multiple males per female, implementation is logistically challenging and requires genotyping of all hatched chicks. Using predicted progeny trait distribution management, a 3.2 g difference in mean EBV for egg weight was obtained for two market-targeted groups, without impact on the predicted progeny mean for the multi-trait index used for selection, or on average parental coancestry, but with a small increase in progeny inbreeding. While maintaining these two egg weight groups, tactical desired gains using trait EBV was used to favourably reduce predicted progeny genetic merit for feed intake from + 0.850 to -0.005 g/day, with little impact on genetic gain for other traits, mean index values, mean parental coancestry, or mean progeny inbreeding. Using pooled semen or multi-sire mating, while accounting for variation in male reproductive success, resulted in only a 0.5% reduction in response in predicted mean progeny index and in small increases in mean parental coancestry (from 0.014 to 0.015) and mean progeny inbreeding (from 0.005 to 0.007).
conclusionsEvaluating the longer-term impacts of OCS and other methods employed requires multi-generation simulations, ideally starting from the current real data as a base. However, the current approach of using a real implementation scenario is important in decision making for real-life applications. Similar benefits from the selection and mating strategies used here are expected in breeding programs for other species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.