ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2026
Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of clinical judgement and rapid tests for leptospirosis in the Philippines: implications for public health management.
Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLeptospirosis is endemic in the Philippines; however, its diagnosis remains challenging because of the lack of rapid and accurate diagnostic tools for detecting infection. Physicians must therefore resort to diagnosing leptospirosis through their clinical judgement, and this often results in under- or overestimation of cases. This study aimed to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of physicians' clinical judgement and commercially available rapid test kits for leptospirosis against reference methods such as the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in the Philippines.
methodsA total of 127 serum samples were collected from patients suspected to have leptospirosis at three hospitals in the Philippines from August to December 2024. Rapid test kit results and final diagnoses were retrieved from the patients' charts. MAT was performed on all the samples as a confirmatory method. Moreover, qPCR was performed on 30 randomly selected samples to increase the sensitivity of the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and 95% confidence intervals were computed to determine the accuracy of both clinical judgement and rapid tests.
resultsAmong the 75 MAT-confirmed leptospirosis cases, approximately 24.0% were misdiagnosed as other febrile illnesses, such as dengue and typhoid fever, on the basis of clinical judgement, whereas 67.3% of the 52 MAT-negative patients were falsely diagnosed with leptospirosis. Overall, clinical judgement demonstrated high sensitivity (76.0%) but low specificity (33.7%), indicating possible overdiagnosis. The rapid test kits used in the laboratory exhibited significantly lower sensitivity (42.7%) but higher specificity (82.7%), suggesting a high probability of false-negative results. When qPCR was used in conjunction with these methods, relatively similar results were obtained.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the diagnostic limitations in detecting leptospirosis in the Philippines, where laboratory testing options remain limited and inaccurate, resulting in physicians often relying on their clinical judgement. Misdiagnosis, whether through clinical judgement or rapid testing, could lead to inappropriate patient management, increased morbidity, and underestimation of leptospirosis incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.