ArticleGenome medicine2026
Exploring phenotype-related single-cells through attention-enhanced representation learning.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- scHILL: deciphering individual-level immune cell heterogeneity with single-cell RNA sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Single-Cell and Spatial Omics: Methods and Applications.MedComm · 2026Review
- Exploring phenotype-related single-cells through attention-enhanced representation learning.Genome medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtlas-level single-cell investigations elucidate disease pathogenesis and progression. Accurate interpretation of phenotype-related single-cell data necessitates pre-defining cell subtypes and identifying their abundance variations. However, batch correction and clustering resolution biases can impact this interpretation. To overcome these challenges, an end-to-end integrative approach that combines both cell- and gene-level information is needed to more accurately connect single-cell characteristics to clinical phenotypes.
methodsWe developed scPhase, a deep learning framework using attention-based multiple instance learning (AMIL). It treats each patient sample as a bag of single cells, learning a comprehensive representation from their gene expression profiles. By incorporating a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) aggregation layer, it predicts clinical phenotypes that generalize across patient cohorts. Furthermore, it includes an interpretability framework that uses cellular attention and gene attribution scores to pinpoint the key cell profiles that drive its predictions.
resultsWe evaluated scPhase across diverse single-cell disease atlases, covering COVID-19 infection, aging, neurodegeneration, and oncology, using single-cell data from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), brain, and tumor tissues. The model consistently outperforms baselines in classifying diverse clinical phenotypes, achieving area under the curve (AUC) scores of 0.895 for COVID-19, 0.840 for Alzheimer’s disease, and 0.951 and 0.962 for lung and colorectal cancers. It shows robust performance in age regression with a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.87. The model’s interpretability framework effectively pinpointed clinically relevant cell populations, enhancing its utility in identifying disease-specific cellular signatures.
conclusionsscPhase offers an interpretable supervised learning framework for single-cell data, accurately predicting sample-level clinical phenotypes while uncovering key biological mechanisms. Furthermore, it can be readily adapted for broader atlas-level clinical phenotype analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.