Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41566353›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2026

Continuous and noninvasive respiratory effort monitoring: a narrative review of emerging techniques.

J Graßhoff, R S P Warnaar, D W Donker, P Rostalski, E Oppersma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J GraßhoffFraunhofer Research Institution for Individualized Medical Technology and Engineering IMTE, Mönkhofer Weg 239a, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. jan.grasshoff@imte.fraunhofer.de.
R S P WarnaarCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
D W DonkerCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
P RostalskiFraunhofer Research Institution for Individualized Medical Technology and Engineering IMTE, Mönkhofer Weg 239a, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
E OppersmaCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Funding

Schleswig-Holstein Project No.: LPW21-455 L/2.2/262, 125 24 009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventilator-induced lung injury and diaphragm dysfunction are well-recognized complications of mechanical ventilation and commonly attributed to inadequate ventilator settings. Excessive or insufficient assistance and the patient's own respiratory effort are increasingly acknowledged as important factors in the pathogenesis of these injuries. Therefore, monitoring respiratory effort at the bedside is a highly relevant strategy to identify and prevent potentially injurious breathing patterns. Esophageal manometry remains the reference standard for assessing respiratory effort, but its technical complexity limits routine clinical use. Placement and calibration of the esophageal balloon are time-consuming and require specific expertise. Moreover, the invasive nature of the procedure precludes visual confirmation and leads to uncertainty about correct positioning, reducing confidence in the validity of measurements. Innovative noninvasive and continuous monitoring techniques are emerging as more accessible and scalable alternatives, enabling assessment of respiratory effort without impacting so much on clinical workflow. This narrative review provides an in-depth overview of three noninvasive techniques that are reshaping continuous respiratory effort monitoring: (1) Surface electromyography (sEMG) now enables continuous monitoring of respiratory muscle activity and derivation of continuous effort estimation using electrodes placed on the torso of the patient. (2) Computational modeling offers dynamic, patient-specific effort estimation from ventilator waveforms. (3) Assessment of diaphragm thickening fraction, derived from high-resolution ultrasound, provides a straightforward surrogate for effort, driven by widely available acquisition devices. Together, these innovations promise to make respiratory muscle monitoring less labor-intensive and more clinically sustainable-paving the way for broader implementation of diaphragm-protective ventilation strategies in critical care.

Indexed as

Airway occlusion maneuversDiaphragm-protective ventilationModel-based estimationSurface electromyographyUltrasoundWork of breathing

Identifiers

PMID41566353
PMCPMC12849107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.