Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41566295›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2026

Hospital ethics committees: responsibilities, competencies and challenges.

Daniel Sperling, Israel Doron, Gila Yakov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel SperlingUniversity of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. dsperling@univ.haifa.aci.il.
Israel DoronUniversity of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Gila YakovMax Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Afula, Israel.

Funding

The study was funded by the Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences at the University of Haifa. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital Ethics Committees (HECs) aim to address complex ethical dilemmas and provide ethical counselling and guidance in hospital and clinical setting. Despite their formal and legalistic authority in Israel, little is known about their actual practices, structure and perceived role by their members.

methodsThis qualitative study employed Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to explore the lived experiences of HEC members in Israeli hospitals and the meaning they attach to their roles. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with committee chairs and members with diverse professional and institutional backgrounds in nine hospitals throughout the country. Data were analyzed using thematic coding to identify key patterns and insights.

resultsFive major themes emerged: (1 Offering support through decisive means; (2) Committee composition, member characteristics and ethics training; (3) Common ethical issues discussed in the Ethics Committee; (4) Committee's decisional functioning; and (5) Committee's relationships with various entities, and the limitations of its operation.

conclusionsHECs in Israel serve a unique dual role as legal and ethical decision-making bodies. While they support clinicians and, to some extent, patients, their potential is hindered by systemic gaps in training, collaboration and engagement. Further research is recommended to explore patient experiences and evaluate committee effectiveness in advancing ethical clinical practice.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEthics Committees, ClinicalProfessional CompetenceProfessional RoleCommittee MembershipEthical DilemmasFemaleHospitalsHumansIsraelMaleQualitative ResearchEthical consellingethical decision makingEthical dilemmasEthicsl committeesEthics trainingHospital ethics committeesIsraelQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41566295
PMCPMC12908306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.