ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Deep learning-based multimodal fusion of MRI and whole slide image for predicting neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Occult Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From AI-Driven Multimodal Fusion to Clinical Translation.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- A transformer-based multi-modal fusion framework for laryngeal lesion classification using contact endoscopy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLocally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) exhibits significant heterogeneity to neoadjuvant targeted therapy and chemotherapy, making personalized treatment selection challenging. This study aims to develop and validate a Transformer-based multimodal fusion model based on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathological whole slide image (WSI) to improve the prediction of neoadjuvant targeted therapy and chemotherapy response in locally advanced HNSCC.
methodsA total of 201 patients with stage III-IV HNSCC receiving neoadjuvant targeted therapy and chemotherapy was recruited from two medical centers. For feature extraction: Macro-level imaging features were extracted from T1WI, T2WI, and contrast-enhanced T1WI (CE-T1WI) using a ResNet50-based deep learning model; Micro-level cellular features were extracted from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained WSIs via Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) analysis, which aggregates patch-level pathological information into slide-level representations. Based on a Transformer fusion framework with multi-head self-attention mechanisms, the multimodal fusion model dynamically weights and fuses cross-scale features across modalities. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The visualization of deep learning model was utilized to enhance interpretability.
resultsThe multimodal fusion model outperformed single-modal models in predicting the overall response rate (ORR) of targeted therapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced HNSCC, with AUC values of 0.862 (95%CI: 0.737–0.943) and 0.825 (95%CI: 0.644–0.939) in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curve and DCA further confirmed its superior clinical effectiveness.
conclusionsIn summary, the MRI deep learning model and pathomics model can differentiate responders from non-responders for neoadjuvant targeted therapy and chemotherapy. The multimodal fusion model, which combines MRI and WSI features, has improved predictive performance in locally advanced HNSCC, providing an interpretable tool for personalized HNSCC treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.