ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
The effect of mobile applications used during pregnancy on prenatal distress and attachment.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Paradox of Digital Monitoring: A Cross-Sectional Study of mHealth Adoption and Its Association with Psychological Distress Among Pregnant Women in Romania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrenatal distress during pregnancy may increase pregnancy complications and negatively affect mother-fetus bonding. Today, mobile health applications play an important role in pregnant women’s search for information and support. This study aims to examine the effects of mobile applications used during pregnancy on prenatal distress level and prenatal attachment.
methodsThis descriptive and comparative study was conducted between March and June 2025 in an obstetrics outpatient clinic of a university hospital in eastern Turkey. The study included 313 pregnant women who were at or after the 32nd week of pregnancy, graduated from at least primary school, used smartphones, did not have risky or multiple pregnancies, and did not have any diagnosed psychiatric illness. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews using the Personal Information Form, Prenatal Attachment Scale (PAS) and Prenatal Distress Scale (PDS) developed by the researcher.
results35.1% of the participants stated that they used pregnancy-related mobile applications. The most preferred application was “Happy Mom” with 42.7% and 80% of the applications had the feature of sending notifications. The mean scores of the total score and sub-dimension scores of the PAS were found to be statistically significantly higher and the mean scores of the total score and sub-dimension scores of the PAS were found to be significantly lower in pregnant women using mobile applications (p < .05).
conclusionThe study shows that the use of mobile applications during pregnancy is associated with higher prenatal attachment levels and lower prenatal distress levels. Mobile applications may support women in adapting to the pregnancy process and in strengthening the mother-fetus bond, although causality cannot be firmly established due to the cross-sectional design of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.