SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2026
Global burden of asymptomatic malaria among blood donors: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalaria is a significant public health concern, particularly in endemic regions. Asymptomatic blood donors pose a risk for transfusion-transmitted malaria, especially in regions with limited donor screening. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to estimate the updated worldwide pooled prevalence of asymptomatic malaria among blood donors and assess the variation in pooled prevalence by region and diagnostic methods used.
methodsA systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, African Journal Online (AJOL), and Google Scholar, covering the period from January 2018 to May 2025. Eligible studies were screened based on pre-specified inclusion criteria. Studies were managed by EndNote 20, data were extracted by using Microsoft Excel 2013, and statistical analysis was done by using STATA version 11. Sub-group analyses were performed based on continents, lab diagnostic methods, and year of study. Due to the presence of heterogeneity random effect model was used. Publication bias was assessed statistically by Egger’s test and graphically through a funnel plot.
resultIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, a total of 17,627 records were retrieved through the database search, of which 15 articles met the eligibility criteria from Africa, Asia, and South America to determine the pooled prevalence of asymptomatic malaria among blood donors. The pooled prevalence of malaria among blood donors was 0.32% (95% CI: 0.25-0.39), and heterogeneity value I2 = 99.2%. The sub group analysis showed that highest prevalence was recorded in the African continent at 15.89% (95% CI: 9.48-22.31), with a heterogeneity value I2 = 99.5% followed by South America at 0.79% (95% CI: 0.30-1.89), with a heterogeneity value I2 = 99.3%, and the lowest prevalence was in the Asian continent 0.21% (95% CI: 0.15-0.27), with a heterogeneity value I2 = 52.2%. The pooled prevalence of asymptomatic malaria among blood donors in terms of diagnostic tests used was, microscopy 21.86% (95% CI: 6.96-36.76), rapid diagnostic test 0.21% (95% CI: 0.153-0.267), and 5.03% (1.12-8.94) using polymerase chain reaction. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The current systematic review and meta-analysis highlight the global prevalence of asymptomatic malaria among blood donors, showing significant regional variations and identifying high-risk areas that pose a serious threat to transfusion safety. Despite limitations such as high heterogeneity and publication bias, the result underscores the need for targeted screening and preventive strategies, particularly in the African region, to enhance blood safety. The result highlights the urgent need for region-specific screening strategies and improved diagnostic approaches to ensure blood transfusion safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.