Observational studyFamily practice2025
Continuity of care for all? Associations between migration background and personal continuity among persons aged 50 and older in Dutch primary care: a registry-based observational study.
Observational study in Family practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContinuity of care (CoC) is linked to better outcomes. Particularly, older adults and those with chronic conditions, like type 2 diabetes (T2D) and dementia, may benefit from CoC. Individuals with a migration background (MB) face challenges in accessing adequate healthcare. Our aim was to study associations between MB and personal continuity of general practitioner (GP) care among older adults, and in subgroups with T2D and dementia.
methodsObservational cohort study (2013-8) based on electronic records from 48 Dutch general practices linked to data from Statistics Netherlands. We specifically compared adults who migrated to the Netherlands to those without MB. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI; low/medium/high) was used to measure CoC. We used multilevel ordinal regression to estimate associations between MB and CoC, adjusted for follow-up time/age/gender/comorbidity/income/practice.
results46 663 individuals aged ≥50 years were included: 72.9% with no MB, 5.7% with Surinamese, 4.3% Moroccan, 2.7% Turkish, 5.1% European, and 9.3% other MB. Compared with those without MB, persons with a Moroccan MB had lower odds of having moderate or high CoC [odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89], and persons with a European MB had higher odds of having moderate or high CoC (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.26). Persons with a Moroccan MB in the T2D subgroup had lower odds of having moderate or high CoC (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.89). No differences were found in the dementia subgroup.
conclusionsThis study reveals inequalities in personal continuity of GP care by MB in the Netherlands. Interventions to improve CoC should actively incorporate MB groups to promote equitable CoC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.