ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026
Evaluating the benefits of using drainage tubes after high tibial osteotomy: A retrospective study.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of using drainage tubes after high tibial osteotomy.MethodsClinical data of 164 patients who underwent high tibial osteotomy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: group A, in which drainage tubes were not placed, and group B, in which drainage tubes were placed postoperatively. C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels; hidden, visible, and total blood losses at 24 h postoperatively; visual analog scale scores at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively; complications; range of motion; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis index at 6 months postoperatively; and differences in patellar diameter, edge of tibial tubercle diameter, and ankle diameter were compared.ResultsAt 24 h postoperatively, the hemoglobin and hematocrit levels in group A were significantly higher than those in group B. Total, hidden, and visible blood losses at 24 h postoperatively were significantly lower in group A than in group B. There were no significant differences in the other indices.ConclusionsThe findings suggested that using drainage tubes after high tibial osteotomy offered no evident advantages. In contrast, they increased postoperative blood loss, which is not conducive to early recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.