Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41566129›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

CT-based Prediction of Visceral Pleural Invasion in Lung Adenocarcinoma ≤ 3 cm: Enhancing Deep Learning Specificity by Waiving Chest Wall Information.

De-Xiang Ou, Li-Wei Chen, Kuan-Yu Chen, Hao-Jen Wang, Shun-Mao Yang, Min-Shu Hsieh, Li-Chieh Chou, Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Yeun-Chung Chang, Mong-Wei Lin and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

De-Xiang OuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Wei ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuan-Yu ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hao-Jen WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shun-Mao YangDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Biomedical Park Hospital, Hsinchu County, Taiwan.
Min-Shu HsiehDepartment of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Chieh ChouDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Fu Jeffrey YangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Yeun-Chung ChangDepartment of Radiology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Mong-Wei LinDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. mwlin@ntu.edu.tw.
Chung-Ming ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. chung@ntu.edu.tw.
Jin-Shing ChenDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

CSRD VA 1National Science and Technology Council 112-2221-E-002-051-MY2National Science and Technology Council NSTC 112-2622-E-002-034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate preoperative prediction of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) in lung adenocarcinoma is essential for guiding surgical decision-making. However, existing prediction models often sacrifice specificity when optimized for high sensitivity, increasing the risk of overtreatment. This study aimed to develop a computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning (DL) model that improves specificity by excluding chest wall information.

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 835 patients with pathologically confirmed lung adenocarcinoma who underwent complete resection at two medical centers. A VPI-DL model was developed using a four-layer convolutional neural network incorporating a novel attention mechanism trained on chest-wall-masked CT inputs. The model was trained on 692 cases and externally validated on an independent cohort of 143 patients. Performance was benchmarked against the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR), a published DL model, and assessments by three thoracic surgeons. Evaluation metrics included area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy under a high-sensitivity operating threshold.

resultsIn external validation, VPI-DL achieved an AUC of 0.91, sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 82%, and accuracy of 83%, outperforming the CTR (specificity 63%), the previously published model (specificity 54%), and thoracic surgeons (specificity 57%) at comparable sensitivity levels. The attention-guided architecture effectively reduced spurious correlations and improved interpretability.

conclusionThe proposed VPI-DL model improves the specificity of VPI prediction while preserving high sensitivity. By intentionally excluding chest wall information, the model offers a robust and interpretable tool to aid preoperative planning and minimize the risk of both under- and overtreatment in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsPleuraPleural NeoplasmsThoracic WallTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisComputed tomographyDeep learningLung adenocarcinomaSpecificitySurgical planningVisceral pleural invasion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.