ArticleEJNMMI research2026
Prediction of tumour hypoxia status from the washout of positron emitters in beam-monitoring PET: carbon-ion irradiation to tumour rat models.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to identify hypoxic regions in tumours using non-invasive imaging without specific radioligands. Tumour hypoxia, which varies during the course of radiation therapy, is an important predictor of treatment effect, therefore, frequent monitoring is required. However, positron emission tomography (PET) using hypoxia-specific radioligands is impractical to perform in every fractionated irradiation. Alternatively, blood flow can be evaluated by measuring washout rates of irradiation-induced positron-emitters in range-verification or beam-monitoring PET. Based on this, we hypothesized that the blood flow supply and kinetics (washout) of the irradiation-produced positron-emitters in the tumour could reflect the tumour oxygen status. Beam-monitoring PET for hypoxic tumour rat models was compared with conventional hypoxia PET. Glioma C6 cancer cells were transplanted into nude rats. Tumours were irradiated with a 12C ion beam, and beam-monitoring PET was performed using a high sensitivity total-body small-animal PET system. A compartment model was applied to the kinetic data of the irradiation produced positron-emitters. Then, 18F-labeled fluoroazomycin arabinoside (18F-FAZA) PET imaging of the hypoxia area of the tumour of the same rat was performed.
resultsThe parametric images of washout rate obtained with beam-monitoring PET were in good agreement with 18F-FAZA-PET images.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the biological washout can be used as diagnostic tool for tumour hypoxia in routine beam-monitoring PET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.