ArticleThe AAPS journal2026
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for Natural Language Querying of Immunogenicity Data for Protein Drugs.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the strengths and limitations of retrieval-augmented generative (RAG) artificial intelligence (AI) for natural language querying of biologics immunogenicity data. The package inserts for drugs approved with biologics license applications (BLA) were retrieved from DailyMed ( https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/ ). The RAG system integrated natural language processing, retrieval, and large language model (LLM) components. ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Llama were queried with five clinical pharmacology-focused questions on factors influencing anti-drug antibody (ADA) incidence and tolerability, including effects of target protein, administration route, and citrate excipients. Outputs were assessed for relevance, faithfulness, and domain-specific accuracy. The dataset included 663 biologics, of which 206 (31.1%) were monoclonal antibodies. The RAG system retrieved relevant contexts for all queries, but several contexts contained inaccuracies related to the presence of non-antibody protein drugs. All four LLMs generated coherent summaries and identified determinants of ADA incidence, such as drug type, assay methods, and concomitant therapy. All models found that injection-site pain occurred with some protein therapeutics containing citrate excipients, and that evidence for a direct causal role of citrate was mixed. Comparative evaluation showed that LLM outputs were generally relevant and faithful to the source text, with variation in the level of detail and comprehensiveness across models. Domain-specific evaluations indicated that responses accurately identified trends in immunogenicity and highlighted the knowledge gaps. While RAG-based systems can retrieve and synthesize immunogenicity assessments from multiple source documents, significant limitations were noted in this use case. The effectiveness of the retriever can limit RAG performance and warrant refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41566090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.