ReviewPsicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS2026
The relationship between executive functions and mathematics: a systematic review with meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
Review in Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study examined the relationship between executive functions (EF) and mathematical skills throughout development using a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
methodThis study included (a) longitudinal studies that (b) reported correlations between EF measures (assessed at Time 1) and mathematics outcomes (assessed at Time 2) in (c) typically developing samples ranging in age from birth to 18 years. Studies were excluded if they were (a) not written in English or Portuguese, (b) aggregated data from typical and atypical populations, or (c) combined data from children and adolescents without distinction. A systematic search was conducted in October 2021 and later updated in 2025 using PsycINFO, SciELO, and PubMed. The risk of publication bias was assessed using funnel plot analysis and Egger's test. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed.
resultsTwenty-nine studies involving children and adolescents (n = 104,295; M_age at Time 1 = 5.4 years; M_age at Time 2 = 8.4 years) were included. The overall correlation between EF and mathematics was moderate and statistically significant (r = 0.30, 95% CI [0.24, 0.36]). Among EF components, working memory showed the strongest association with mathematical performance (r = 0.43, 95% CI [0.35, 0.50]), followed by cognitive flexibility (r = 0.34, 95% CI [0.27, 0.42]) and inhibitory control (r = 0.21, 95% CI [0.13, 0.29]). Age and study quality did not significantly moderate the relationship between EF and mathematics.
conclusionThe findings suggest that EF, particularly working memory, is a meaningful predictor of mathematical performance across development. These results underscore the importance of early EF assessment in informing interventions designed to prevent math learning difficulties. Despite the low risk of publication bias, the high heterogeneity observed in most analyses suggests the influence of additional moderating variables that warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.