ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Low microsatellite instability revisited: a review.
Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Status of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mismatch Repair Deficient Colorectal Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI), caused by impaired mismatch repair (MMR), has gained prominence as a biomarker predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in various cancers. MSI-high (MSI-H) tumours exhibit widespread instability across multiple microsatellite loci and are well-characterized. In contrast, low-level microsatellite instability (MSI-L)-marked by instability at a low number of loci-is poorly understood and its biological relevance remains controversial. MSI-L has often been grouped together with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours, given the lack of consistent molecular distinctions. However, some studies, particularly in colorectal and gastric cancers, have reported that MSI-L correlates with distinct clinical and molecular features, including poorer prognosis, increased tumour mutational burden (TMB) following chemotherapy, and better response to platinum/5-fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Notably, these associations frequently involve instability at dinucleotide repeat markers, hinting at a specific subset of MSI-L. Moreover, recent data provide initial evidence that MSI-L may be associated with subtle alterations of genes involved in DNA damage tolerance pathways. This review aims to clarify the current understanding of MSI-L by (a) comparing diagnostic methods and their influence on MSI-L classification, (b) summarizing clinical and molecular associations of MSI-L specifically in gastric and colorectal cancer, (c) highlighting new aspects regarding potential mechanisms underlying MSI-L, focusing on the particular unstable marker and a possible role of the DNA damage tolerance pathways, and (d) discussing whether MSI-L, particularly defined by dinucleotide repeat instability, may serve as a marker for therapeutic vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.