ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
Radiomics-based diagnosis of acute cholangitis using non-contrast computed tomography: a preliminary study.
Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe developed a radiomics model for the diagnosis of acute cholangitis using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe included 79 patients with acute cholangitis and 79 without known liver disease; all patients underwent NCCT and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Patients were randomly divided into a development dataset (n = 118) and a test dataset (n = 40). In total, 999 radiomics features were extracted from each segmented liver. Two experienced radiologists interpreted the NCCT for evidence of acute cholangitis by a consensus-based approach. Subsequently, both radiologists re-evaluated each case using the arterial and delayed phase CECT. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the NCCT-based radiomics model, NCCT-based radiologists' evaluation, and CECT-based radiologists' evaluation. McNemar's test was used to compare sensitivities and specificities.
resultsIn the test dataset, the NCCT-based radiomics model demonstrated an AUC-ROC of 0.888 for diagnosing acute cholangitis. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 95%, 75%, and 85%, respectively. Radiologists' evaluation achieved a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 82.5% when using NCCT. These metrics improved to 95% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 97.5% accuracy when re-evaluated with additional CECT images. The performance of the NCCT-based radiomics model was comparable to that of radiologists' evaluation using CECT images (p = 0.68).
conclusionThe NCCT-based radiomics models demonstrated potential in diagnosing acute cholangitis; this approach may offer a viable alternative to CECT, particularly in patients with contraindications to contrast agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41566065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.