Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41566028›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Comparison of intraoral ultrasound, computed tomography and histopathology in assessment of depth of invasion in buccal mucosa cancers - a cross-sectional study.

Monesha Baskaran, S M Azeem Mohiyuddin, Anil Kumar Sakalecha, R Kalyani, A Sagayaraj, Kouser Mohammadi, Guru M Yogendra

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monesha BaskaranDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, 563103, India.
S M Azeem MohiyuddinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, 563103, India. azeem_hn@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0974-2057
Anil Kumar SakalechaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, 563103, India.
R KalyaniDepartment of Pathology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, 563103, India.
A SagayarajDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, 563103, India.
Kouser MohammadiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, 563103, India.
Guru M YogendraDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, 563103, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has high prevalence in this region mainly affecting buccal mucosa in elderly females due to tobacco quid chewing. Depth of invasion (DOI) affects staging, prognosis and treatment outcome. Pre-operative Contrast Enhanced Computed tomography (CECT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are expensive and have limitations in assessing DOI.Buccal mucosa tumors not involving bone can be assessed for DOI by intraoral ultrasound (IOUS). RESEARCH QUESTION: Is IOUS reliable alternative to CECT in assessing DOI in buccal mucosa cancers?

methodsThis cross-sectional analytical study compared assessment of DOI using IOUS and CECT in buccal mucosa cancers against gold standard of histopathology in 52 patients with OSCC staged T2 or T3. Sonologist, radiologist assessing CECT and pathologist were blinded against each other's findings. DOI by above methods was compared and correlation analysis between each imaging and histopathology was done.

resultsOut of 52 patients, DOI was same as histopathology in 37 patients (71.2%) by IOUS and in 14 patients (26.9%) by CECT. IOUS over-estimated DOI in 11 (21.1%) patients by 1-2 mm whereas CECT over-estimated DOI in 34 patients (65.4%) by 3-5 mm. DOI was under-estimated in 4 patients (7.1%) each by IOUS and CECT. Correlation coefficient between IOUS and histopathology was 0.929 and that between CECT and histopathology was 0.874 for DOI.

conclusionIOUS is reliable, easily available tool without ionizing radiation in assessing DOI in OSCC not involving bone.

resultsare encouraging compared to CECT, but it is operator dependent. Multi-institutional, large studies may further validate this conclusion.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellMouth MucosaMouth NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingUltrasonographyComputed tomographyDepth of invasionHistopathologyOral squamous cell carcinomaTransoral ultrasoundTumor margins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.