Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41566022›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

The effect of liquid type on the detection of airway invasion during swallow evaluation.

Eiman Abu Bandora, Liav Hayat, Yarden Ashkenazi, Yael Oestreicher-Kedem, Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer, Yuval Nachalon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eiman Abu BandoraDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Liav HayatDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yarden AshkenaziDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yael Oestreicher-KedemDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer *Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yuval Nachalon *Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. yuval.nachalon@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6202-4647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore FEES findings obtained using different liquid types, water, cow's milk, and soy milk, with respect to observed penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue, and to describe agreement across liquids.

methodsAdult patients referred to a university-affiliated dysphagia clinic underwent standardized FEES using water, cow's milk, and soy milk during single and consecutive swallows. Evaluations were performed jointly by a laryngologist and a speech-language pathologist (SLP). Outcome measures included the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale. Inter-rater reliability was assessed through blinded reassessment of 25% of examinations by an additional laryngologist and two SLPs.

resultsMost swallows across all liquids were classified as safe. Unsafe PAS scores occurred numerically more frequently with cow's milk (18.2-25.6%), than with water (6.9-11.6%) or soy milk (9.4-11.6%). For single swallows, a nominal overall difference across liquids was observed (Cochran's Q = 6.00, p = 0.050), and for consecutive swallows an overall difference was also detected (Cochran's Q = 8.00, p = 0.018). Pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant after correction for multiple testing. No statistically significant differences were identified between liquids for vallecular or pyriform sinus residue. Agreement in PAS scores across liquids ranged from low to moderate (κ = 0.291-0.609), and agreement for residue scores ranged from moderate to almost perfect (κ = 0.528-0.824). Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.93, 95% CI [0.90-0.95], p < 0.001).

conclusionIn this exploratory within-subject study, no statistically significant differences were observed in FEES penetration, aspiration, or pharyngeal residue scores when using water, cow's milk, or soy milk. These findings provide preliminary descriptive data regarding the behavior of a commonly consumed plant-based liquid during FEES and may inform future research on liquid properties in swallowing assessment.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersMilkPharynxRespiratory AspirationAdultAgedAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSoy MilkWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID41566022
PMCPMC13002630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.