ArticleScientific reports2026
The relationship between natural hydrogen flow rates and production viability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fault-controlled natural hydrogen reservoirs as underground hydrogen storage sites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the widespread occurrence of mostly low concentrations of molecular hydrogen (H₂) in nature, the quantity of commercially recoverable natural hydrogen underground remains uncertain. Two production variants are conceptually considered: a self-replenishing system, in which underground generation balances off-take; and accumulation systems, in which H₂ is trapped underground over long periods and is extracted similarly to conventional natural gas deposits. To assess the potential of natural hydrogen, we compiled and harmonised global data on H₂ flow rates, flux rates, and concentrations from various sources like seeps, springs, mines, and wells. Across different geological settings, observed large natural H₂ flow rates typically fall between 10⁵ and 10⁷ cubic meters per year (m³/yr). When comparing these values to the output of producing natural gas wells and economic viability thresholds for modelled H₂ projects, we find that commercially viable rates must be at least an order of magnitude higher (≥ 10⁷-10⁸ m³/yr). Furthermore, sustained production at high hydrogen purity over two to three decades is generally required for commercial success. Based on this analysis, we argue that economically recoverable natural hydrogen from self-replenishing systems is unlikely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.