ArticleCommunications biology2026
Distinct contributions of prefrontal, parietal, and cingulate signals to exploratory decisions.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct contributions of prefrontal, parietal, and cingulate signals to exploratory decisions.Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exploratory decisions could be motivated by multiple reasons, such as to reduce uncertainty of existing options (i.e. internal exploration) or to identify new alternatives (i.e. external exploration). Exploratory behaviours are related to a wide range of brain regions including the intraparietal cortex (IPS), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). However, whether these regions play unique roles signalling different aspects of exploration remain unclear. Here, we identified unique internal and external exploratory signals in the IPS and ACC, respectively. Crucially, these signals were invariant to the impending decisions. In contrast, the mPFC flexibly encoded the value of internal exploration, external exploration or collecting a reward based on the type of impending decision. This is consistent with the neural common currency hypothesis suggesting the mPFC's role in signalling general decision value. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the unique roles of IPS, ACC and mPFC during exploratory decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.