ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Hemorrhage Segmentation in Fundus Images Using the U-Net 3+ Model: Performance Comparison Across Retinal Regions.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most common complications of diabetes, and timely detection of retinal hemorrhages is essential for preventing vision loss. This study evaluates the U-Net3 + model for pixel-level hemorrhage segmentation in fundus images and examines its performance across clinically meaningful retinal regions. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Dice score and further analyzed across perivascular and extravascular areas, perifoveal and extrafoveal regions, fovea-centered quadrants, and images stratified by hemorrhage burden. U-Net3 + achieved strong overall performance, with 99.93% accuracy, 87.03% sensitivity, 99.97% specificity, and an 85.02% Dice score. Higher segmentation accuracy was observed in extravascular regions and within the foveal area, while quadrant-wise performance remained largely consistent. Images with greater hemorrhage burden demonstrated higher segmentation reliability. These findings highlight the importance of region-aware evaluation and suggest that U-Net3 + can provide clinically meaningful support for automated DR screening. Further validation using larger and multi-center datasets is required to enhance the model's generalizability for real-world clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41565928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.