ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic rockfall risk assessment using multi-source data fusion and 3D simulation: a case study of Jiaohua rock.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rockfall represents a sudden and highly destructive geological hazard, posing significant risks to mountainous communities and infrastructure. This study presents an integrated dynamic risk assessment for the Jiaohua perilous rock zone in Kaizhou District, Chongqing, China, by fusing multi-source data including field investigation, UAV photogrammetry, and 3D numerical simulation. Kinematic analysis identified a critical slope angle of 57° for rockfall initiation, enabling the classification of two primary susceptibility zones. High-precision 3D simulations using RAMMS: ROCKFALL were conducted on six identified hazardous rock masses (#WY1–#WY6). The simulations delineated two distinct rockfall mechanisms: #WY1–#WY3 sources generate high-energy, short-duration impacts, achieving kinetic energies up to 1.88 × 10⁴ kJ within 10–15 s, posing a direct threat to the residential area below. Conversely, rockfalls from #WY4–#WY6 involve longer travel paths with considerable energy attenuation, yet residual kinetic energy remains capable of causing zonal damage. The simulated kinetic energies were translated into quantitative impact force estimates, forming the basis for differentiated mitigation strategies. These include active reinforcement and high-strength interception for short-range, high-energy events, and multi-level buffering with trajectory control for long-runout cases. This integrated methodology offers a scientifically grounded framework for precise hazard prevention and serves as a valuable reference for rockfall risk management in analogous geological settings, particularly within the Three Gorges Reservoir area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.