ArticleScientific reports2026
Functional and cognitive correlates of typing speed in a large U.S. panel study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An online population-representative longitudinal cognitive dataset from the Understanding America Study.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Typing has become increasingly integral to everyday functioning. To comprehensively understand people's level of functioning, researchers may also want to consider typing performance in addition to performance of other classical activities of daily living like dressing, shopping, or managing a budget. Classical typing tests are too burdensome to administer in panel studies. We examined functional and cognitive correlates of a one sentence typing speed test to examine if this brief measure could provide meaningful information. A sample of 10,613 adult participants in the Understanding America Study (UAS), a nationally representative longitudinal online survey panel, completed surveys, cognitive tests, and the typing test. Intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.79 for computer typing speed and 0.63 for smartphone typing speed suggested high test-retest stability for the brief typing test across 2 years. Faster typing speed was generally associated with better cognitive functioning across domains, fewer reported difficulties with basic and instrumental activities of daily living, and a lower likelihood of several self-reported illnesses. After adjustment for demographics, the correlation magnitudes were attenuated but still generally in the expected directions. Typing speed as captured by a single sentence typing speed test appeared to be sensitive to several measures relevant to everyday functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.