ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2026
Widespread exposure to neonicotinoid insecticide in bobcats (Lynx rufus), fishers (Pekania pennanti), and river otters (Lontra canadensis) in North Dakota, USA.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neonicotinoids are the most widely used class of insecticides and are marketed as being safe for wildlife because of their specificity to the nervous system of invertebrates. However, recent work has found widespread environmental exposure to neonicotinoids for several species, as well as an adverse effect on behavior and survival of captive white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and other non-target species. Our objective was to measure imidacloprid in the spleens of three wild mesocarnivore species in North Dakota: bobcats (Lynx rufus), fishers (Pekania pennanti) and river otters (Lontra canadensis). We detected imidacloprid in 13% (n = 112), 15% (n = 100), and 35% (n = 100) of bobcats, fishers, and river otters with respective mean concentrations of 3.25, 4.07, and 3.33 ng/g. Mean imidacloprid concentrations found in spleens of mesocarnivores were nearly 10 times greater than the mean level of imidacloprid in spleens of captive white-tailed deer fawns that died during neonicotinoid experiments and were 5 times greater than in free-ranging deer (0.60 ng/g) in North Dakota. The probability of detecting imidacloprid was related to Julian date and peaked around 18 July for otters. The detection probability in these species increased as they increased their distance from water. Imidacloprid concentration also varied by minor watershed for river otters. Detection probability and imidacloprid concentration was not related to age, sex, Julian date, distance to water, or year for bobcats or fishers. Our findings confirm the presence of imidacloprid in vertebrate species unlikely to have direct contact with treated grain crops. This suggests that the perpetuation or maintenance of imidacloprid within food webs potentially extends well beyond the seasonal agricultural influx. Further research is needed to understand these dynamics, and their impact to animal and environmental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.