Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41565854›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning for individual epigenetic fingerprints as predictors of well-being in young adults.

Andrea Caporali, Alberto Di Domenico, Claudio D'Addario, Francesco de Pasquale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea CaporaliFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy. andrea.caporali@unicam.it.
Alberto Di DomenicoDepartment of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Claudio D'AddarioDepartment of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, 64100, Teramo, Italy. cdaddario@unite.it.
Francesco de PasqualeFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The crisis in youth mental health has intensified, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Traditional assessment tools like the Perceived Stress Scale and Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) index provide valuable insights. However, to address the multifaceted nature of mental issues, molecular biomarkers should be integrated with neuropsychological data when modeling these scales, in order to unravel the interplay of genetic, environmental, and psychological factors. This study explores the interaction of these factors using machine learning to model HSP scores in university students. By conducting exhaustive feature selection, a data-driven classification model is trained to provide individual multivariate fingerprints. Despite the limited sample size, the model achieves remarkable accuracy, sensitivity, and precision. The integration of epigenetic features seems crucial, indicating the importance of balancing neuropsychological and genetic influences for accurate modeling. Our findings pave the way for future clinical applications, since the collection of questionnaires and saliva samples might offer accessible avenues for mental health assessment and personalized healthcare.

Indexed as

COVID-19Epigenesis, GeneticMachine LearningMental HealthAdultClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMalePredictive Learning ModelsPsychological Well-BeingYoung AdultEpigeneticsHighly sensitive personsMachine learningMental healthMultivariate fingerprint

Identifiers

PMID41565854
PMCPMC12901966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.