ArticleScientific reports2026
Structural and computational supported development of 2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-oxadiazole analogues as active LOX, urease, and α-glucosidase inhibitors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A series of N-substituted analogues of 1,3,4-oxadiazole were synthesized and screened for their enzyme inhibitory activity against lipoxygenase, α-glucosidase, and urease enzymes. Spectroscopy studies including IR, 13C-NMR, and 1H-NMR techniques were used to confirm structures of the novel compounds obtained. Compounds 7a, 7f, 7i, 7l, and 7n were found to be the best inhibitor candidates with the highest % of inhibition (89.42 ± 1.33, 78.79 ± 1.29, 84.87 ± 1.53, 75.67 ± 1.62, and 89.54 ± 1.48, respectively) and the least IC50 values (7.15 ± 1.34, 14.26 ± 1.07, 9.12 ± 1.17, 14.31 ± 1.19, and 7.03 ± 1.08 µM, respectively) against α-glucosidase compared to acarbose used as a standard. Compounds 7b, 7h, and 7n were found to be the most potent with % of inhibition 92.2 ± 0.5, 94.5 ± 0.6, and 92.8 ± 0.8, respectively, and with the IC50 values 4 ± 1.05, 1.0 ± 0.3, and 1.5 ± 0.5 µM, respectively, against the lipoxygenase. With the IC50 value of 21.85 ± 1.43 µM and the percentage inhibition of 98.45 ± 1.69%, compound 7l was found to be more active in comparison with the standard drug thiourea. Docking analysis further supported these biological outcomes by demonstrating strong, well-oriented binding poses and favorable interaction profiles for the most active inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.