ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
The relationship between uncertainty and trust in genomic medicine and research: A literature review and thematic analysis.
Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concepts of uncertainty and trust in genomic research and clinical care have not been consistently defined across studies, leading to varied claims about the relationship between them. The role that social groups play in this relationship is also therefore unclear. A categorisation of themes of trust and uncertainty will help to clarify and compare research claims. A review was conducted of peer-reviewed literature that discussed both 'trust' and 'uncertainty' in genomics research and/or medicine from 1 January 2018 to 28 June 2024. Exclusion criteria removed studies that did not focus on human genomics, and did not mention 'trust' or 'uncertainty'. Discussions of 'trust', 'uncertainty' and 'social groups' were coded into distinct categories. The search returned 1070 unique abstracts from which 26 studies passed the exclusion criteria. Sixteen distinct uses of 'trust' and fifteen uses of 'uncertainty' were identified alongside sixteen social groups. Relationships between uncertainty and trust were often described as being mediated by a third variable. Irreducible forms of uncertainty reported in studies suggest a need to move towards assisting patients and data donors understand and feel comfortable with uncertainty and make use of 'productive uncertainties' to foster trust. More research is needed to understand how social group belonging may shape the relationship between trust and uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.