ArticleScientific reports2026
Hierarchical bayesian fusion of inspection and monitoring data for probabilistic bridge deterioration assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bridges are susceptible to long-term deterioration due to environmental exposure and cyclic loading, making the accurate evaluation of crack evolution crucial for predictive maintenance and structural safety management. Traditional deterioration models that rely solely on periodic inspection data often fail to capture the dynamic and stochastic nature of crack propagation. To address this limitation, this study proposes a hierarchical Bayesian inference framework that integrates discrete inspection data with continuous crack monitoring data to achieve a unified probabilistic characterization of bridge deterioration. First, a Bayesian Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model based on the Weibull distribution is developed to model the failure risk of bridge deck slabs. The model robustly handles right-censored data through sampling and incorporates multiple covariates, including crack number, type, damage category, bridge span, and geometric parameters. Posterior distributions of the shape and scale parameters, together with hazard ratio analysis, quantitatively reveal the influence of each factor on structural failure risk. Second, within the dynamic state layer of the proposed hierarchical framework, a Metropolis-Hastings-based regression model is constructed to estimate incremental crack growth, which is then aggregated monthly to form a continuous degradation trend series. This method effectively captures the response of crack development to environmental fluctuations and supports predictive analysis for on-site maintenance planning. Finally, the failure risk model and the crack evolution model are coupled within a hierarchical Bayesian framework to enable joint risk estimation. The proposed model integrates multi-source information with varying temporal resolutions and uncertainty levels and employs a Bayesian posterior updating mechanism to adaptively refine parameters as new monitoring data become available. Validation using real bridge monitoring datasets demonstrates that the posterior-updated model significantly outperforms traditional inspection-based approaches in capturing crack failure behavior and long-term deterioration trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.