ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting dialyzer fiber blocking is hard due to high intrapatient variability and limited utility of thrombin generation markers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, no reliable blood-based or instrumental parameters are available to quantify dialyzer fiber blocking during hemodialysis. The only accurate method remains micro-computed tomography (µCT) imaging of the hemodialyzer post-dialysis, a labor-intensive process currently limited to research settings. Although several cross-sectional studies have employed µCT to evaluate hemodialyzer performance and anticoagulation strategies, intrapatient variability of this method has not been systematically examined. This study addressed that gap by enrolling ten chronic hemodialysis patients, each undergoing two series of three identical dialysis sessions: one with full anticoagulation and one with only 25% of the standard anticoagulation dose. µCT imaging after each session revealed important intrapatient variability in fiber blocking, comparable in magnitude to interpatient variability. These findings underscore the need for caution when interpreting cross-sectional assessments of dialyzer clotting and highlight the importance of accounting for intrapatient variability in the design and sample size estimation of future studies on clotting. Additionally, among the parameters derived from whole blood thrombin generation (WBTG) tests, only lag time and time to peak demonstrated correlations with fiber patency. However, due to their limited predictive accuracy at the individual level, even these promising markers fall short of providing clinically useful predictors for dialyzer fiber blocking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.