Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41565734›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Scaling digital models.

Deniz Karanfil, Bahram Ravani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deniz KaranfilDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. dkaranfil@ucdavis.edu.
Bahram RavaniDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of accurate digital models (DMs) for physical systems requires virtual representations that faithfully capture the underlying physics of the system or equipment being represented. Physics-based DMs provide reliable predictions only when accurate mathematical models of physical systems exist. When such models are incomplete or uncertain, experimental calibration can significantly improve model fidelity. However, in industries where systems or equipment exist in multiple sizes or configurations, performing experimental calibration for each variant can be prohibitively expensive and time-consuming. To address this challenge, this paper introduces a novel methodology and modular computational framework that leverages machine learning (ML) and dimensional analysis (DA) to enable scaling of DMs. The proposed approach allows calibration to be performed on a single representative system, with results scaled to other system sizes, whether from full-scale to reduced-scale prototypes or vice versa. Traditional applications of DA in this context often encounter difficulties due to distorted scaling factors. This work resolves these challenges by developing a consistent scaling framework tailored for DMs. The methodology is demonstrated by a case study in which a calibrated DM of a wheel loader is scaled between an industrial-size system and a miniaturized laboratory system.

Identifiers

PMID41565734
PMCPMC12902011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.