ArticleScientific reports2026
An efficient and consistent framework for multi-rank taxonomic identification in wildlife images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TMacaque-FaceNet: Automatic Facial Recognition Based on Vision Transformer for Wild Tibetan Macaques.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and scalable taxonomic classification is essential for biodiversity research, supporting systematic species identification across multiple hierarchical ranks. However, current image-based classification methods often fail to enforce taxonomic consistency, a critical limitation that undermines the reliability of their outputs for scientific use. Additionally, field-based biodiversity studies are constrained by limited computational resources and network availability on edge devices. To address these challenges, this paper proposes TaxonomyNet, an ensemble detection model with six independent heads for taxonomic classification, achieving high detection performance across all ranks (mAP: 90.7-99.75%) after training on a dataset of 50 Australian animal species. Furthermore, to resolve the core challenge of prediction inconsistency, we introduce the Weighted Agreement Loss (WAL) metric-a confidence-weighted disagreement measure designed to enforce structural coherence between predicted outputs and a reference taxonomy. Crucially, the application of this consistency-enforcing mechanism enhances hierarchical classification reliability, improving final species-level accuracy by up to 3.87% compared to baseline and recent published domain-specific foundation models, while also demonstrating superior computational efficiency, reducing delay by 22 minutes across 1500 samples and making it highly suitable for deployment on edge devices. This work provides a practical and extensible solution for reliable hierarchical classification in real-world biodiversity monitoring scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.