ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploring the actual stacking height of metal powder bed in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Powder Spreading Dynamics and Process Optimization at a Heterogeneous Interface for Z-Direction Multi-Material Laser Powder Bed Fusion.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is an additive manufacturing process that builds parts by layer-by-layer spreading and selective laser melting of metal powders. The characteristics of the powder bed are closely related to laser parameters and the particle size distribution of the metal powder. However, the actual stacking height of the powder bed changes dynamically due to shrinkage during powder spreading, melting, and solidification. This study investigates the actual stacking height of metal powders by analyzing powder flow behavior during falling, spreading, melting, and solidification using the Discrete Element Method (DEM) and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The results show that height shrinkage caused by powder spreading can be eliminated by increasing the gap between the blade and the working platform from 0 μm to 20 μm. The shrinkage rates due to solidification and liquid metal flow were found to be 8.5% and 31.5%, respectively. Furthermore, mathematical models relating the actual stacking height to layer thickness, number of layers, and solidification shrinkage were established, providing a theoretical foundation for LPBF processes with larger layer thicknesses, as well as for support structure design, printing accuracy, and allowance planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.