ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2026
Factors important to historically underrepresented applicants in ranking orthodontic programs.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate whether significant differences existed in the influence among factors considered during the selection process when ranking orthodontic programs and to understand how an individual's race or ethnic background might affect what factors were more important than others. Materials and Methods: A survey was distributed to orthodontic residents to assess overall preferences and differences in desirability of various factors between historically underrepresented racial and ethnic (HURE) and non-HURE applicants. Results: A total of 115 individuals initiated the survey, and 98 were included for analysis. Sixteen respondents were considered HURE applicants. "Clear aligner therapy training," "good quality of clinical faculty," and "high number of cases started" had the highest mean desirability overall. The most important factors influencing program rank order were "satisfied current residents," "low cost," and "having multiple techniques and treatment philosophies taught." HURE respondents rated "diversity of training of faculty" (P = .0154), "racial and ethnic diversity of current and former residents" (P = .0007), "racial and ethnic diversity of faculty" (P = .0002), "racial and ethnic diversity of patient population" (P = .0131), "male : female ratio of residents" (P = .0225), "participation in care of Medicaid patients" (P = .0251), and "dental school-based program" (P = .0493) higher than their non-HURE counterparts. Conclusions: Clinical factors are the most important to program applicants. However, HURE applicants place greater importance than non-HURE applicants on characteristics that promote inclusivity and representation of individuals of similar racial and ethnic backgrounds (peers, mentors, and patients).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.