ArticleEndocrine journal2026
Lenvatinib in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a real-world institutional analysis.
Article in Endocrine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lenvatinib is a standard systemic therapy for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-R DTC). Although pivotal trials such as SELECT demonstrated significant efficacy, real-world evidence remains limited, particularly regarding treatment timing and the role of planned drug holidays. We retrospectively analyzed 44 consecutive patients with RAI-R DTC treated with lenvatinib between 2015 and 2024. All patients initiated therapy at 24 mg/day, with dose reductions and treatment interruptions-including planned drug holidays-implemented according to toxicity. Efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and best tumor shrinkage. A subgroup analysis was conducted in patients with lung metastases. The median PFS was 36.0 months, and the median OS was 76.7 months. ORR was 52.3% and DCR was 95.5%. In the lung metastases-only subgroup (n = 25), outcomes were particularly favorable: PFS 58.1 months, unreached OS, ORR 64.0%, and DCR 100%. Univariate Cox analysis identified performance status, histological subtype, TV-DT, and tumor burden as significant prognostic factors. The most common adverse events were hypertension, proteinuria, fatigue, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia; these were generally manageable with dose adjustments and individualized planned holidays. Clinically meaningful renal dysfunction was rare despite frequent proteinuria. Lenvatinib demonstrated durable efficacy and acceptable tolerability in real-world practice, especially in patients with lung metastases. Early treatment initiation and individualized toxicity management-including planned drug holidays-enabled sustained dose intensity and prolonged disease control. These findings support the clinical utility of personalized adverse event management strategies in routine care for RAI-R DTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.