ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2026
A gene-specific variance-control approach corrects polygenicity-driven inflation observed in transcriptome-wide association studies.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of hub genes involved in early-onset schizophrenia: from genetic susceptibility to predicted regulated gene expression.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- High false sign rates in transcriptome-wide association studies.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Post-genome-wide association study variant-to-function challenges in asthma research.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Review
- Functionally informed cis and trans proteome-wide association studies prioritize disease-critical genes.Research square · 2026Article
- Functionally informed cis and trans proteome-wide association studies prioritize disease-critical genes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Multi-ancestry transcriptome prediction with functionally informed variants in TOPMed MESA improves performance of transcriptome-wide association studies.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) and related methods (xWASs) have been widely adopted in genetic studies to understand molecular traits as mediators between genetic variation and disease. However, the effect of polygenicity on the validity of these mediator-trait association tests has largely been overlooked. Given the widespread polygenicity of complex traits, it is necessary to assess the accuracy of these mediator-trait association tests. We found that, for highly polygenic target traits, the standard test based on linear regression is inflated, leading to dramatically increased false-positive rates that grow linearly with sample size and heritability. To address this inflation, we propose an effective variance-control method-similar to genomic control but allowing for a different correction factor for each gene. Using simulated and real data, as well as theoretical derivations, we show that our method yields calibrated false-positive rates, outperforming existing approaches. We further demonstrate that methods analogous to TWASs, namely those that associate genetic predictors of mediating traits with target traits, suffer from similar inflation issues. We advise developers of genetic predictors for molecular traits (including polygenic risk scores, PRSs) to compute and provide the necessary inflation parameters to ensure proper false-positive control. Finally, we have updated our PrediXcan software package and resources to facilitate this correction for end users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.