ArticleBehaviour research and therapy2026
Thought suppression worsens mood and obsessions but improves them subsequently: First evidence of a contrast avoidance effect for the maintenance of thought suppression.
Article in Behaviour research and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of the Chinese version of the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe cognitive behavioral model for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) suggests that suppression of unwanted thoughts (TS) is negatively reinforced by temporarily preventing obsessions and reducing distress. It further suggests that ceasing TS subsequently creates a rebound effect leading to increased obsessions/distress. However, the contrast avoidance model (CAM) suggests that TS concurrently increases and then sustains obsessions/negative affect, thus increasing the likelihood of negative and positive reinforcement (positive contrast) and avoiding a negative contrast later. We tested these theories using intensive ecological momentary assessment.
methodForty-nine individuals diagnosed with OCD received seven prompts/day for seven days examining current obsessions, TS, negative and positive mood.
resultsIn line with CAM, higher TS was associated with higher concurrent negative mood and obsessions. Also, higher TS was associated with decreased obsessions and negative mood and increased positive mood 2 h later. Lower TS was associated with lower negative mood and obsessions concurrently and increased negative mood 2 h later. Thus, TS may have been negatively and positively reinforced-through subsequent (as opposed to concurrent) reduced negative mood and increased positive mood-and not engaging in prior TS was punished, such that it was associated with a subsequent uptick in negative mood.
conclusionTaken together, the present study showed the first evidence for a contrast avoidance effect (i.e., avoidance of sharp increases in negative emotion and decreases in positive emotion) for the maintenance of TS in OCD. Results suggest that targeting contrast avoidance may help reduce maladaptive cognitive strategies such as TS in OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.